COMPARISON · DUPKLIUM PRICES CHECKED OCTOBER 29, 2026

SignalForge vs
Duplikium.

Duplikium (now at trade-copier.com) is a Swiss cloud trade copier that has copied MT4 and MT5 accounts since 2013: you hand it the login, password and broker of your master and slave accounts, and its cloud holds the connections. If your job is executing TradingView alerts on MT5 with risk controls, here is the honest math.

Start free for 14 days See our other comparisons

Side by side.

SignalForge against Duplikium, line by line. Their quotes are from their own pages, dated.

SignalForgeDuplikium
What it is Signal bridge: TradingView webhook executes on your MT5 through our EA, with risk checks before every order Account copier: replicates trades from a master account into slave accounts; no webhook-first product
TradingView webhook JSON schema documented; deterministic parser, symbol alias and did-you-mean Not documented. Their TradingView page describes trading on a compatible broker inside TradingView into a demo master account
Broker credentials EA path: only a SignalForge token. SFCloud hosted path needs MT5 credentials like any managed hosting - and shows you the live terminal Login, password and broker of the master AND the slave accounts, entered in their cockpit; their cloud holds the connections
Entry price $4.99/mo (Starter, 1 MT5 account, unlimited signals) 9 EUR/account/month, per SIDE: a master plus a slave = 18 EUR/month minimum (their billing)
Free trial 14 days, no card 30 EUR of credit, no card (SMS verification required)
Risk engine where the order lands EA v4.09: rejects SL inside the spread, refuses entries whose SL was already passed, never leaves a position naked, multi-TP by R, news filter, Prop Firm Shield, max lot cap Not documented per signal
Signal when the terminal reconnects Held up to 120 s and delivered when the EA is back; ack and verdicts in your signal log Slave-offline behavior not documented: only "alerts in case of failed orders or disconnection" and their disclaimer that they are "not responsible for missed trading opportunities"
Latency ~180 ms webhook-to-EA and ~0.5 s to the broker-confirmed order (median, production, Sep 19-23, 2026). Method published "Internal Trade Copier latency between 1-3 ms" - their internal figure, different pipeline
Scale claims Production since Feb 2025; measured stats published with method "30,000+ connected accounts", "6,000,000+ orders copied weekly", "5,000+ supported brokers" (their claims)
Seeing your terminal SFCloud: live web terminal with journal and control No terminal view; servers in Frankfurt, London, NY and Singapore (their site)
Platforms MT4/MT5 focus MT4, MT5, cTrader, FXCM TS, LMAX, DXtrade + futures platforms in beta
Site and support English and Spanish, native English

Duplikium prices from trade-copier.com/pricing on October 29, 2026 (duplikium.com redirects there). Duplikium SA is registered in Switzerland and has operated since 2013. Their quotes are from their own pages on that date.

When the terminal reconnects.

A terminal drops for a few seconds now and then: a broker reconnect, a settings reload, an EA update. This is what each bridge does with an alert that arrives in that gap.

Duplikium

FROM THEIR SITE

Their cloud holds both sides of the copy, so a "terminal" in their model is a connection they maintain. What happens to a signal when a slave is offline is not documented on their site: the closest is "live monitoring - alerts in case of failed orders or disconnection", plus the disclaimer that their backup system leaves them "not responsible for missed trading opportunities". There is no documented delivery queue, retry policy or duplicate protection to check before relying on it.

SignalForge

HOW OURS WORKS

If your EA checked in during the last 15 minutes, the alert is stored and handed over as soon as the EA is back, by push or by polling if the push channel is down. We hold it for 120 seconds; after that it expires without executing, so a late reconnect never fires a stale entry. Silent for longer, but seen in the last 2 hours? We answer TradingView with a retryable error and it resends the alert up to 3 times, 5 seconds apart. Past that, the alert is rejected and the reason goes to your signal log.

Their wording comes from trade-copier.com (features, pricing and their TradingView copier page), checked on October 29, 2026. Ours describes production behavior on the same date.

Where SignalForge wins

SIGNALFORGE

The job. Duplikium copies account to account; we execute signals. A TradingView alert reaches our EA with a documented JSON schema, the EA v4.09 checks risk before every order (stop inside the spread is rejected, a passed stop never opens, positions are never left naked, multi-TP by R, news filter, Prop Firm Shield), delivery is held 120 s with ack, and the flat price is $4.99/mo against 18 EUR/month minimum for a single master-slave pair. The trial is 14 days without a card, and everything exists in Spanish too.

Where Duplikium wins

HONESTLY

Longevity and breadth. They have copied accounts since 2013 across MT4, MT5, cTrader, FXCM, LMAX and DXtrade (futures platforms in beta), with servers in four regions, a Trade Copier API for white-labels, and machine-readable docs (llms.txt and ai.txt). Their internal 1-3 ms copy latency and their claimed 30,000+ connected accounts are real scale numbers. If what you want is pure account-to-account copying, they are an established option.

Questions about the choice.

Are these prices current?

Checked on trade-copier.com/pricing on October 29, 2026. Duplikium.com redirects there; the company is Duplikium SA (Switzerland), operating since 2013. Their billing charges each master and each slave account separately.

Do I have to hand over my broker password?

With Duplikium, yes: their model requires the login, password and broker of both the master and the slave accounts. With SignalForge's EA on your own MT5 (or your VPS), no - the EA polls our API with its own token. Our SFCloud hosting does need your MT5 credentials like any managed hosting, but you get the live web terminal in exchange.

Does Duplikium take TradingView webhooks?

Their site does not document a webhook product. Their TradingView page describes operating a compatible broker inside TradingView into a demo master account, which Duplikium then copies to the slaves - no JSON schema, no per-signal risk checks.

Which one is faster?

Different pipelines: their 1-3 ms figure is internal copier latency between their own connections. Ours is measured end-to-end on the signal path: ~180 ms webhook-to-EA and ~0.5 s to the broker-confirmed order, with the method published. Both exclude factors neither vendor controls, like your broker's queue.

Compare on your own account.

Two weeks on demo tells you more than any comparison table. Set your alerts, watch the executions, then decide.

Start the free trial →